Java 21 introduced Virtual Threads (Project Loom), a major innovation for handling concurrency. While traditional platform threads have been the backbone of multithreading in Java for decades, virtual threads promise massive scalability with less memory overhead. In this article, we’ll break down the differences, performance impact, JVM internals, and when to use each in real-world systems.
Platform (traditional) threads are mapped directly to the operating system (OS) threads. Each platform thread requires its own stack memory (typically 1–2 MB). The JVM delegates scheduling and context switching to the OS kernel.
// Example: Creating multiple platform threads
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
new Thread(() -> {
try { Thread.sleep(1000); } catch (Exception e) {}
}).start();
}
⚠️ Problems with Platform Threads:
Virtual threads are lightweight threads introduced in Java 21. They are scheduled by the JVM, not the OS. Each virtual thread uses only a few KB of memory and can be parked/unparked efficiently.
// Example: Using virtual threads
try (var executor = Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor()) {
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
executor.submit(() -> {
Thread.sleep(1000);
return null;
});
}
}
✅ Benefits of Virtual Threads:
The core difference is how they are scheduled:
Aspect | Platform Threads | Virtual Threads |
---|---|---|
Memory per Thread | 1–2 MB (stack) | ~Few KB |
Scheduling | OS Kernel | JVM (user-mode) |
Context Switching | Heavy (kernel-level) | Lightweight (cooperative) |
Best for | CPU-bound tasks | I/O-bound tasks |
Real-world apps often mix both:
Virtual threads handle thousands of fund transfers concurrently, while platform threads run fraud detection algorithms.
Virtual threads scale checkout requests for millions of users, while platform threads generate invoices and run payment encryption.
Virtual threads manage client connections, while platform threads handle heavy-duty video encoding and compression.
If asked: "Should we completely replace threads with virtual threads?"
Answer: No. Virtual threads are best for I/O concurrency, but CPU-heavy workloads still benefit from platform threads. A hybrid approach is ideal.
Virtual threads are a massive step forward in Java concurrency. They simplify writing high-concurrency apps without async/complex frameworks. However, traditional platform threads are still crucial for CPU-bound workloads. Knowing when to use which will help you design scalable and efficient systems.
👉 Also read: Time & Space Complexity in Java
0 Comments